Philo and Sophia practise every part of the Listening paper together
Three unrelated short extracts, each with two three-option multiple-choice questions — six questions in total from just three recordings.
Why did the speaker not correct people's assumption earlier?
"it was easier than explaining" directly supports B — nothing in the extract suggests indecision (A) or fear of disappointment (C).
One monologue, about three minutes long, with eight gapped sentences to complete — the same format as FCE Part 2, but the content and vocabulary are more specialised.
At this level the missing information is sometimes a precise technical term or figure. If you miss it, leave a guess based on the sentence's grammar (a number, a name, a place) rather than leaving it blank.
One longer conversation between two or more speakers (around four minutes), with six four-option questions on opinion, attitude, and detailed meaning.
What is the guest's overall assessment of the restoration?
"Largely, yes" plus "a cost worth naming" together rule out both an unqualified success (A) and a failure (C) — the nuanced middle ground is B.
Five short, themed monologues (around 30 seconds each) are heard, and you complete two separate matching tasks against them — ten questions in total from the same five recordings.
You're answering two different questions about the same five speakers, so on the second listen, focus entirely on the second task — trust the answers you already noted for the first.
6 marks
8 marks
6 marks
10 marks
30 marks total, one per question, no penalty for guessing.